Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02218
Original file (BC 2014 02218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02218

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to 
honorable.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In 1978, he was cited for possession of marijuana “residue” in 
his car while returning from a night out with fellow airmen.  
His First Sergeant was notified and to his knowledge, no action 
was taken for a couple of months.  He had planned on not 
reenlisting and when offered a general under honorable 
conditions discharge, he accepted.  

On 3 Jan 14, after having served for more than 34 years as a 
federal civil servant, he retired.  He is trying to become a 
member of USAA and is not able to do so with anything except an 
honorable discharge.  The board should find it in the interest 
of justice to consider his untimely request so he may be able to 
get the insurance coverage he desires.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 22 Aug 75, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force.  

On 19 Nov 78, according to DD Form 1569, Incident/Complaint 
Report, the local county jailer telephone the base security 
police to notify them of the applicant’s off base arrest for 
possession of a controlled substance, speeding and having no 
driver’s license.  

On 30 Nov 78, he pleaded guilty to illegal possession of a 
controlled substance (marijuana), an offense punishable under 
Article 134 of the UCMJ.  

On 12 Jan 79, his squadron commander notified him he was 
recommending him for discharge under provisions of AFM 39-12, 
Separation for Unsuitability, Misconduct, Resignation or Request 
for Discharge for the Good of the Service, chapter 2, section C, 
paragraph 2-23, for his civil court conviction for possession of 
a controlled substance.  The applicant acknowledged receipt the 
same day.  

On 18 Jan 79, he submitted a statement to the approval authority 
offering his conditional waiver of rights associated with an 
administrative discharge board hearing contingent upon him 
receiving a general discharge.

On 5 Feb 79, the Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) found the discharge 
proceedings legally sufficient and recommended the applicant be 
given a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation.

On 12 Feb 79, the approval authority approved his commander’s 
recommendation that he be administratively discharged under the 
provisions of AFM 39-12, section C, chapter 2, paragraph 2-23 
for conviction by civil authorities.  

On 16 Feb 79, the applicant received a general under honorable 
conditions discharge.  He was credited with 3 years, 4 months 
and 25 days of active service.   

On 4 Jun 14, a request for post-service information was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.  


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or 
injustice that occurred in the discharge processing.  Based on 
the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was 
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority.  
The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to 
believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the 
provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or 
disproportionate to the offenses committed.  In the interest of 
justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on 
clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is 
sufficient to recommend granting relief on that basis.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02218 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 May 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Clemency Bulletin, dated 4 Jun 14.			

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03309

    Original file (BC 2013 03309.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    k. On 4 Apr 79, the applicant was in violation of AFR 35-10 and again failed to go at the prescribed time to his appointed place of duty. On 9 Nov 79, 22 Nov 79, 2 Dec 79 and 11 Dec 79, the applicant's commander received notice from American Express stating that the applicant's account was overdrawn. On 21 Jan 80, 5 Feb 80, 11 Feb 80, 14 Mar 80, 15 Mar 80 and 15 Apr 80, the applicant's commander received notice from AAFES stating that the applicant had written numerous dishonored checks.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00438

    Original file (BC-2008-00438.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00438 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The applicant was discharged on 8 May 80. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03847

    Original file (BC 2007 03847.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03847 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 Dec 78, for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801796

    Original file (9801796.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01796- COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MQ 2 7 s988 APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. 98-01796 APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant has provided post-service documentation which is attached at Exhibit E. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. 19 M a r & 1979, American Red Cmss reprsemtive,his authorized...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00131

    Original file (BC-2006-00131.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 Jan 78, the applicant amended his original conditional waiver and waived his rights associated with an administrative discharge board hearing contingent on his receipt of no less than a general discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Feb 06. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 7 Feb 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00755

    Original file (BC-2006-00755.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00755 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 SEPTEMBER 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200280

    Original file (0200280.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. On 7 Jan 80, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for being in a fight on 10 Dec 79 at Peterson AFB, CO. His APRs reflect superior performance; however, despite drug rehabilitation and an Article 15 for marijuana possession, the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00313

    Original file (BC-2011-00313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00313 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Prior to his termination from the Air Force on 22 Dec 78, his service record was outstanding. While we found no evidence of an error or injustice with regards to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00408

    Original file (BC-2004-00408.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00408 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 18 Jan 80, applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFM 39-12, by reason of misconduct - frequent involvement...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00424

    Original file (BC-2006-00424.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 19 Apr 74, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), for a period of six years. Punishment imposed was a reduction in grade to airman (E-2) and forfeiture of $100 for one month; (10) O/a 3 and 4 Apr 78, applicant received an Article 15 for failure to go to his prescribed place of duty on time. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,...